H1000 is on my want list of powders also. Maybe the IMR Enduron series will be very well appreciated and I'm able to transfer to that for far better availability.
They've carried out identically for me. Like Anyone else I rushed to get the more recent SC Variation but have now switched back again. Ideally you need about a hundred% loading density. If you have ample scenario ability to the H4831(extended) that you are likely improved off.
Can they be interchanged without anxieties other then making use of regular load procedures when switching from great deal to ton?
Minnesota H4831SC is my head over to in the 7mm Rem Mag, but I'm conserving the very little I've still left for slide 2021. I would start low and function your way up, based on what load data you examine for this combo the min/max loads are all over the board.
INgunner54 mentioned: It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Uncovered a node and shot some groups.
Apache Jct Fantastic information, I've jars of each and generally wondered if they may be reloaded With all the exact recipes must I operate out of one or the other.
VERIFY YOUR AGE Selected states prohibit promoting or marketing and advertising of firearms, ammunition, and linked firearm components to minors. We’d like to make sure that you’re 18 yrs of age or more mature in advance of letting you to buy our internet site. Are you 18 a long time of age or more mature?
and it is advisable to invest in some new load data books. powder composition and chemistry can does adjust over time. 4831 powder of decades ago just isn't same as what's currently available. that is certainly why somebody seriously interested in reloading securely should have probably the most existing load data textbooks to refer to.
I've located the exact reverse being true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and Similarly precise powder in my 300 Acquire Mag.
It really is amusing how through the years loading countless unique cartridges in many alternative rifles that I have not acquired suitable conclude results h4831sc load data with H-4831 or perhaps the short-Minimize version.
I essential a little a lot more myself so I went in advance and grabbed the 8lb jug being coated for a while (and also have a lot of the same wide range of powder).
Soon after examining this text (and a lot of Other people, but this a single is considered the most data pushed with various accredited shooters) I have stopped stressing about touching or being within a magical length in the lands, and commenced loading the place I could enhance a number of elements of a load. Just my .02, ideally you may get anything to work for ya.
A number of the old Lyman data just listed IMR 4831, which was surplus military powder and now more recent mfg as H4831.
I sawed just h4831 vs h4831sc one in 50 % to check out how thick the jackets were, they usually ended up effortlessly 2 times as thick to be a fifty-grain hollow place was. Ditto for that sixty four-grain Power Issue, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie h4831 vs h4831sc puppies or woodchucks. You now know everything I find out about the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I do not know anything whatsoever regarding the 223. I doubt that you're going to get wherever with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to know how it goes.